2015 Colorado - Morning After, Thoughts?

Kinja'd!!! "MooseKnuckles" (andyschenk)
11/21/2013 at 09:13 • Filed to: colorado, chevrolet, truck, 2015, midsize, truckyeah

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 6
Kinja'd!!!

I had/have a high level of anticipation for this new truck; it's going to be in my garage level of anticipation.

I think it looks great. The gas engine options are pretty typical for this size of truck-but diesel! I've been closely following news and rumours surrounding the development for what seems like years and my own assumptions about it's final form were pretty much spot on.
I like that they beefed it up, and truckified the front end in comparison to the global Colorado. It's nice to see influence from the 2014 Silverado in it.
Specs and size basically peg it in 1st gen Silverado capability (1999-2005? model years). Quick rundown refresh:
-5 inches narrows, 3 inches lower roof line, 900lbs lighter than 2014 fullsize GM trucks
-extended cab and crew cab only. rear bench in ext-cab only seats two and can be a deleted option entirely (good for fleet purposes). Crew cab offers full 3-person bench in the back.
-Crew cab can be optioned with short 5ft bed, or regular 6ft bed.
-6spd auto
-3.6L V6 300hp 270lb-ft
-2.5L I4 195hp 185lb-ft
-2016 brings the diesel 2.8L, probably with 200hp 350lb-ft
-Tow "greater" than 6700lbs when optioned accordingly

Is this truck missing anything you thought or wished it would have?
Mind you, a manual transmission is a pretty firm rumour that it is coming, maybe at the same time as the 2.8 diesel in 2016. And we haven't seen the options list, and if it's like any other truck it's going to be long and get pricey.
Also, the new 4.3L V6 found in the full size trucks wasn't used because the 3.6L fuel efficiency was better to the point that the lack of torque was over ruled. GM felt that for the purpose of this truck, fuel econ would be a bigger player than torque for the consumer.
There is no word of an LTZ trim level (top level before getting into the 'truxury luxury' Denali and new High County), so maybe that is how they will set it apart for the GMC Canyon a little bit more; start the Canyon's lowest priced model right where midrange Colorado models are priced and give it a more luxe package in lieu of the LTZ absence.

I'm also hoping we see something like the ZR2 package (more hardcore offroad package that the Z71: factory lifted, wider stance, skid plates, suspension) that was offered on the S10. Same with the other end of the spectrum, a street performance variation.

Oddly, at my first impression, the only thing that came to mind was a removable rear window. Just like what the Avalanche had. Could be taken out in a matter of seconds and stored safely out of the way behind the rear bench seat back. It would be more novelty than anything, so I'm not sure why I am giving a second thought.
Lastly, I want to see how the GMC Canyon looks and is spec'd. I've always been a bigger fan of Big Red over the Chevy twin, so ya, I'm one of those people.

Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!!

DISCUSSION (6)


Kinja'd!!! ADabOfOppo; Gone Plaid (Instructables Can Be Confusable) > MooseKnuckles
11/21/2013 at 09:24

Kinja'd!!!1

I'm with you on all those points.

I have a 94 Dakota 2WD ext cab that I bought on CL. You may or may not remember my inane posts about my search for a cheap truck.

Unless Ford pulls a new Ranger with diesel out of their ass, we will probably get a Colorado/Canyon once they let us have the oil-burner.

My wife gets the GM family discount, and we would qualify for a 0% loan. So unless they decide to be idiots and price this thing out the wazoo, I will be hoping to spec an Ext-Cab, long bed, 4WD, diesel for ~$26,000. If the GMC version is only ~$28k we might try for it.


Kinja'd!!! pdish > MooseKnuckles
11/21/2013 at 09:47

Kinja'd!!!0

I am excited for a small truck back in the US too, but the high bed and sloped front with the large fender flares reminds me of a Rigeline a little too much. Small diesel will end up winning though, and should help me get over the looks. I was thinking when I get back to the states I would be looking for a 4dr Wrangler or a Tacoma for my needs, but this changes things.


Kinja'd!!! pdish > MooseKnuckles
11/21/2013 at 09:47

Kinja'd!!!0

I am excited for a small truck back in the US too, but the high bed and sloped front with the large fender flares reminds me of a Rigeline a little too much. Small diesel will end up winning though, and should help me get over the looks. I was thinking when I get back to the states I would be looking for a 4dr Wrangler or a Tacoma for my needs, but this changes things.


Kinja'd!!! pdish > MooseKnuckles
11/21/2013 at 09:48

Kinja'd!!!0

I am excited for a small truck back in the US too, but the high bed and sloped front with the large fender flares reminds me of a Ridgeline a little too much. Small diesel will end up winning though, and should help me get over the looks. I was thinking when I get back to the states I would be looking for a 4dr Wrangler or a Tacoma for my needs, but this changes things.


Kinja'd!!! pdish > MooseKnuckles
11/21/2013 at 09:51

Kinja'd!!!0

I am excited for a small truck back in the US too, but the high bed and sloped front with the large fender flares reminds me of a Ridgeline a little too much. Small diesel will end up winning though, and should help me get over the looks. I was thinking when I get back to the states I would be looking for a 4dr Wrangler or a Tacoma for my needs, but this changes things.


Kinja'd!!! Skif6996 > ADabOfOppo; Gone Plaid (Instructables Can Be Confusable)
11/21/2013 at 17:52

Kinja'd!!!0

I would bet the Chevy is closer to $28k than the GMC will be. IIRC the outgoing Colorado wasnt much less than a Silverado was after rebates. Although I did just see that you get supplier pricing so that is probably right on point.